The Settlement Negotiation Process for Automobile Bodily Injury Liability

نویسنده

  • Richard A. Derrig
چکیده

Third party liability insurance settlements are by their nature the result of negotiations between the claimant, or his/her representative, and a representative of the insurer, acting on behalf of the policyholder (Ross, 1980). When substantial non-economic or general damages are expected in any settlement, such as in auto bodily injury liability claims, the nature of the settlement process must differ from the simple first party reimbursement for medical bills or vehicle repair or replacement costs paid and include negotiation and bargaining strategies. Recent research efforts have noted only the outcomes of lower negotiated general damage settlements, in the form of lower settlement to special damages ratios, in the presence of suspicion of fraud (Crocker and Tennyson (2002), Loughran (2002), and Derrig and Weisberg (2004). This paper uses a unique data set from Massachusetts to investigate the negotiation process in terms of the leverage points available to each party and the sequence of claimant demands and insurer offers through settlement. A framework for the negotiation process is proposed, in terms of offer to demand ratios with the value of one representing the settlement. We find that, on average, the ratio of complete offers to demands will increase by about 1/N, where N is the number of rounds to settlement, but with wide variation depending on claim characteristic specifics. The initial anchoring provided by attorney demands plays a prominent role (Wright and Anderson, 1989) and leads to generally higher settlements as a result of negotiation. Suspicion of fraud and build-up has the opposite effect, lowering the general damage valuation agreed to by both parties. Lower (higher)than average offer/ demand ratio adjustments are generally followed by larger (smaller) ratio adjustments indicating an implicit fixed target ratio at the end of each full round of negotiations, perhaps influenced by the information held by each party on prior settlements. Version 1.1 April 14, 2004

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Forecasting the maximum compensation offer in the automobile BI claims negotiation process

Most motor bodily injury (BI) claims are settled by negotiation, with fewer than 5% of cases going to court. A well-defined negotiation strategy is thus very useful for insurance companies. In this paper we assume that the monetary compensation awarded in court is the upper amount to be offered by the insurer in the negotiation process. Using a real database, a log-linear model is implemented t...

متن کامل

Legal Status of Pre-Contractual Liability

The discussion about the person's liability for the actions attributable to him before the stage of contracting is a new debate that has been attracted the attention of legal circles. According to this debate, the person’s freedom of contracting does not implement the person’s freedom to ignore the rights and interest of other party. As a result, it would be possible that contracting person con...

متن کامل

Pii: S0144-8188(00)00026-0

In this paper, we examine the economics of Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, whereby the negotiation processes at the pretrial stage are made inadmissible to prove the amount of liability. It is asserted that under Rule 408 a settlement offer is less inclined to be rejected since the judge is expected to make a lower award given the signal he observes. Also, we derive a sufficient cond...

متن کامل

Reconciling International Investment Law and Climate Change Policy : Potential Liability for Climate Measures Under the Trans - Pacific Partnership

The pending Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement has raised controversy, fueled by leaks of the draft text and congressional debate over fast-track negotiation authority. Like similar agreements, the TPP creates the risk of government liability for enacting regulations, especially new or comprehensive measures to address climate change. This Article analyzes how the TPP’s investor pr...

متن کامل

The Co-Existence of Loan Receipt Agreements and Contribution in Illinois

INTRODUCTION Pre-trial settlement is a mechanism widely used to avoid needless and drawn out litigation. 1 Pre-trial settlement not only reduces the burden on overcrowded court dockets, but also provides an injured party with a relatively quick source of compensation. 2 Allowing both parties to negotiate a mutually satisfactory solution is often preferable to judicial resolution.' The number of...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004